protein bounds Search Results


94
Bio X Cell anti mouse pd 1 mab
Anti Mouse Pd 1 Mab, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pmc08732307-57-4-35?v=Bio+X+Cell
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse pd 1 mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech anti tmem 59
Anti Tmem 59, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/hinzman_charles_p__2022__investigating_the_impact_of_pancreatic_cancer_derived_extracellular_vesicles_on_the_tumor-953-5-18?v=Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti tmem 59 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Rockland Immunochemicals human seprase fap accusignal elisa kit
FAPα + Macrophages Are Enriched in the Myeloma Microenvironment and Correlate with Disease Progression. (A) Heatmap of gene expression in macrophages from patients with MM (n = 3) or healthy donors (HDs, n = 3). (B,C) Cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages (CD11b + CD14 + ) and FAPα + BMSC (CD45 − CD38 − CD29 + ) in PBMCs or BMMCs from patients with MM (n = 9). (D) Reprehensive immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in the BM of a NDMM patient (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (E–G) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages and FAPα + BMSCs in BMMCs from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 27) or HDs (n = 4). (H) Correlation analysis of the cell percentages between CD138 + MM cells and FAPα + macrophages or FAPα + BMSCs in patients with NDMM (n = 15). (I) Reprehensive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) images of CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM or MM‐CR (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (J,K) Western blot (J) and flow cytometry (K) analysis of FAPα expression in macrophages co‐cultured with MM cells (n = 3). (L) TGFβ1 expression in different MM cell lines. (M‐N) TGFβ1‐induced FAPα protein expression in macrophages (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (O) M‐CSF, TGFβ1, and FAPα levels in BM supernatants from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 37) using <t>ELISA</t> assay. (P) Correlation analysis of FAPα and TGFβ1 or M‐CSF in BM supernatant from patients with NDMM (n = 17). (Q) Reprehensive IHC images of bone marrow samples from patients with MM (n = 18) (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (R) IOD values of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in patients with NDMM or RRMM (n = 18). (S) Correlation analysis between CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM. (T) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and overall OS in the set of patients with NDMM based on FAP protein expression level detected in tumor tissues. The median value of FAP RNA expression in the was 88.26 (IOD). The expression value of the FAP high group (n = 9) was >88.26(IOD) and the FAP low group (n = 9) was <88.26(IOD). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot means independent samples. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2‐tailed Student's t ‐test in C, E, F, G, K, O, and R, a Pearson correlation in H, P, and S, a log‐rank test in T. MM, multiple myeloma; HD, healthy donors; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BMMCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BM, bone marrow; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; RRMM, relapsed or refractory MM; CR, complete response; TGFβ1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; M‐CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IOD, Integrated Optical Density; RRMM, Relapsed/Refractory MM; PFS, Progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.
Human Seprase Fap Accusignal Elisa Kit, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pmc13042965-210-32-39?v=Rockland+Immunochemicals
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human seprase fap accusignal elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Boster Bio anti p p100
FAPα + Macrophages Are Enriched in the Myeloma Microenvironment and Correlate with Disease Progression. (A) Heatmap of gene expression in macrophages from patients with MM (n = 3) or healthy donors (HDs, n = 3). (B,C) Cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages (CD11b + CD14 + ) and FAPα + BMSC (CD45 − CD38 − CD29 + ) in PBMCs or BMMCs from patients with MM (n = 9). (D) Reprehensive immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in the BM of a NDMM patient (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (E–G) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages and FAPα + BMSCs in BMMCs from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 27) or HDs (n = 4). (H) Correlation analysis of the cell percentages between CD138 + MM cells and FAPα + macrophages or FAPα + BMSCs in patients with NDMM (n = 15). (I) Reprehensive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) images of CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM or MM‐CR (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (J,K) Western blot (J) and flow cytometry (K) analysis of FAPα expression in macrophages co‐cultured with MM cells (n = 3). (L) TGFβ1 expression in different MM cell lines. (M‐N) TGFβ1‐induced FAPα protein expression in macrophages (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (O) M‐CSF, TGFβ1, and FAPα levels in BM supernatants from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 37) using <t>ELISA</t> assay. (P) Correlation analysis of FAPα and TGFβ1 or M‐CSF in BM supernatant from patients with NDMM (n = 17). (Q) Reprehensive IHC images of bone marrow samples from patients with MM (n = 18) (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (R) IOD values of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in patients with NDMM or RRMM (n = 18). (S) Correlation analysis between CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM. (T) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and overall OS in the set of patients with NDMM based on FAP protein expression level detected in tumor tissues. The median value of FAP RNA expression in the was 88.26 (IOD). The expression value of the FAP high group (n = 9) was >88.26(IOD) and the FAP low group (n = 9) was <88.26(IOD). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot means independent samples. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2‐tailed Student's t ‐test in C, E, F, G, K, O, and R, a Pearson correlation in H, P, and S, a log‐rank test in T. MM, multiple myeloma; HD, healthy donors; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BMMCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BM, bone marrow; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; RRMM, relapsed or refractory MM; CR, complete response; TGFβ1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; M‐CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IOD, Integrated Optical Density; RRMM, Relapsed/Refractory MM; PFS, Progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.
Anti P P100, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pm39362609-193-12-37?v=Boster+Bio
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti p p100 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bio X Cell monoclonal mouse igg1 antibody
FAPα + Macrophages Are Enriched in the Myeloma Microenvironment and Correlate with Disease Progression. (A) Heatmap of gene expression in macrophages from patients with MM (n = 3) or healthy donors (HDs, n = 3). (B,C) Cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages (CD11b + CD14 + ) and FAPα + BMSC (CD45 − CD38 − CD29 + ) in PBMCs or BMMCs from patients with MM (n = 9). (D) Reprehensive immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in the BM of a NDMM patient (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (E–G) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages and FAPα + BMSCs in BMMCs from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 27) or HDs (n = 4). (H) Correlation analysis of the cell percentages between CD138 + MM cells and FAPα + macrophages or FAPα + BMSCs in patients with NDMM (n = 15). (I) Reprehensive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) images of CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM or MM‐CR (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (J,K) Western blot (J) and flow cytometry (K) analysis of FAPα expression in macrophages co‐cultured with MM cells (n = 3). (L) TGFβ1 expression in different MM cell lines. (M‐N) TGFβ1‐induced FAPα protein expression in macrophages (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (O) M‐CSF, TGFβ1, and FAPα levels in BM supernatants from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 37) using <t>ELISA</t> assay. (P) Correlation analysis of FAPα and TGFβ1 or M‐CSF in BM supernatant from patients with NDMM (n = 17). (Q) Reprehensive IHC images of bone marrow samples from patients with MM (n = 18) (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (R) IOD values of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in patients with NDMM or RRMM (n = 18). (S) Correlation analysis between CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM. (T) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and overall OS in the set of patients with NDMM based on FAP protein expression level detected in tumor tissues. The median value of FAP RNA expression in the was 88.26 (IOD). The expression value of the FAP high group (n = 9) was >88.26(IOD) and the FAP low group (n = 9) was <88.26(IOD). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot means independent samples. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2‐tailed Student's t ‐test in C, E, F, G, K, O, and R, a Pearson correlation in H, P, and S, a log‐rank test in T. MM, multiple myeloma; HD, healthy donors; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BMMCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BM, bone marrow; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; RRMM, relapsed or refractory MM; CR, complete response; TGFβ1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; M‐CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IOD, Integrated Optical Density; RRMM, Relapsed/Refractory MM; PFS, Progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.
Monoclonal Mouse Igg1 Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pm34973084-43-4-16?v=Bio+X+Cell
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal mouse igg1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boster Bio rabbit anti ln
FAPα + Macrophages Are Enriched in the Myeloma Microenvironment and Correlate with Disease Progression. (A) Heatmap of gene expression in macrophages from patients with MM (n = 3) or healthy donors (HDs, n = 3). (B,C) Cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages (CD11b + CD14 + ) and FAPα + BMSC (CD45 − CD38 − CD29 + ) in PBMCs or BMMCs from patients with MM (n = 9). (D) Reprehensive immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in the BM of a NDMM patient (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (E–G) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages and FAPα + BMSCs in BMMCs from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 27) or HDs (n = 4). (H) Correlation analysis of the cell percentages between CD138 + MM cells and FAPα + macrophages or FAPα + BMSCs in patients with NDMM (n = 15). (I) Reprehensive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) images of CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM or MM‐CR (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (J,K) Western blot (J) and flow cytometry (K) analysis of FAPα expression in macrophages co‐cultured with MM cells (n = 3). (L) TGFβ1 expression in different MM cell lines. (M‐N) TGFβ1‐induced FAPα protein expression in macrophages (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (O) M‐CSF, TGFβ1, and FAPα levels in BM supernatants from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 37) using <t>ELISA</t> assay. (P) Correlation analysis of FAPα and TGFβ1 or M‐CSF in BM supernatant from patients with NDMM (n = 17). (Q) Reprehensive IHC images of bone marrow samples from patients with MM (n = 18) (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (R) IOD values of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in patients with NDMM or RRMM (n = 18). (S) Correlation analysis between CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM. (T) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and overall OS in the set of patients with NDMM based on FAP protein expression level detected in tumor tissues. The median value of FAP RNA expression in the was 88.26 (IOD). The expression value of the FAP high group (n = 9) was >88.26(IOD) and the FAP low group (n = 9) was <88.26(IOD). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot means independent samples. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2‐tailed Student's t ‐test in C, E, F, G, K, O, and R, a Pearson correlation in H, P, and S, a log‐rank test in T. MM, multiple myeloma; HD, healthy donors; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BMMCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BM, bone marrow; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; RRMM, relapsed or refractory MM; CR, complete response; TGFβ1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; M‐CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IOD, Integrated Optical Density; RRMM, Relapsed/Refractory MM; PFS, Progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.
Rabbit Anti Ln, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/10__5713_slash_ajas__2009__80381-36-18-25?v=Boster+Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti ln - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
ProSci Incorporated anti lpcat3
FAPα + Macrophages Are Enriched in the Myeloma Microenvironment and Correlate with Disease Progression. (A) Heatmap of gene expression in macrophages from patients with MM (n = 3) or healthy donors (HDs, n = 3). (B,C) Cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages (CD11b + CD14 + ) and FAPα + BMSC (CD45 − CD38 − CD29 + ) in PBMCs or BMMCs from patients with MM (n = 9). (D) Reprehensive immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in the BM of a NDMM patient (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (E–G) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages and FAPα + BMSCs in BMMCs from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 27) or HDs (n = 4). (H) Correlation analysis of the cell percentages between CD138 + MM cells and FAPα + macrophages or FAPα + BMSCs in patients with NDMM (n = 15). (I) Reprehensive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) images of CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM or MM‐CR (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (J,K) Western blot (J) and flow cytometry (K) analysis of FAPα expression in macrophages co‐cultured with MM cells (n = 3). (L) TGFβ1 expression in different MM cell lines. (M‐N) TGFβ1‐induced FAPα protein expression in macrophages (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (O) M‐CSF, TGFβ1, and FAPα levels in BM supernatants from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 37) using <t>ELISA</t> assay. (P) Correlation analysis of FAPα and TGFβ1 or M‐CSF in BM supernatant from patients with NDMM (n = 17). (Q) Reprehensive IHC images of bone marrow samples from patients with MM (n = 18) (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (R) IOD values of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in patients with NDMM or RRMM (n = 18). (S) Correlation analysis between CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM. (T) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and overall OS in the set of patients with NDMM based on FAP protein expression level detected in tumor tissues. The median value of FAP RNA expression in the was 88.26 (IOD). The expression value of the FAP high group (n = 9) was >88.26(IOD) and the FAP low group (n = 9) was <88.26(IOD). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot means independent samples. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2‐tailed Student's t ‐test in C, E, F, G, K, O, and R, a Pearson correlation in H, P, and S, a log‐rank test in T. MM, multiple myeloma; HD, healthy donors; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BMMCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BM, bone marrow; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; RRMM, relapsed or refractory MM; CR, complete response; TGFβ1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; M‐CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IOD, Integrated Optical Density; RRMM, Relapsed/Refractory MM; PFS, Progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.
Anti Lpcat3, supplied by ProSci Incorporated, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/10__1038_slash_s41589___020___00734___x-344-21-22?v=ProSci+Incorporated
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti lpcat3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International paclitaxel
Chemotherapeutic synergy. (a) Isobolograms of MAD1 and Doxorubicin (Dox), <t>Paclitaxel</t> (Ptx) or Cisplatin (Cis) combinatorial synergy in OVCAR-3 (left) and NCI/ADR-RES (right) cells. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) < 1 and < 0.5 represent additive and synergistic effects, respectively. (b) Comparison of Dox and Cis IC50 towards NCI/ADR-RES as either a monotherapy (ADR-RES, black) or in combination with 20 μM MAD1 (ADR-RES + MAD1, grey). Activity of each drug as a monotherapy in pre-resistant OVCAR-3 (OVCAR-3, white) cells shown for comparison. (c–f) Indicated ovarian cancer cell line or patient-derived ovarian carcinoma cells were cultured in ultra-low attachment conditions and treated for 48 h with 2 μM cisplatin or 4 μM MAD1 alone and in combination. Data represent volume in arbitrary units (a.u.) and median.
Paclitaxel, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pmc07596148-84-17-21?v=Chem+Impex+International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
paclitaxel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
StressMarq anti acrolein
Chemotherapeutic synergy. (a) Isobolograms of MAD1 and Doxorubicin (Dox), <t>Paclitaxel</t> (Ptx) or Cisplatin (Cis) combinatorial synergy in OVCAR-3 (left) and NCI/ADR-RES (right) cells. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) < 1 and < 0.5 represent additive and synergistic effects, respectively. (b) Comparison of Dox and Cis IC50 towards NCI/ADR-RES as either a monotherapy (ADR-RES, black) or in combination with 20 μM MAD1 (ADR-RES + MAD1, grey). Activity of each drug as a monotherapy in pre-resistant OVCAR-3 (OVCAR-3, white) cells shown for comparison. (c–f) Indicated ovarian cancer cell line or patient-derived ovarian carcinoma cells were cultured in ultra-low attachment conditions and treated for 48 h with 2 μM cisplatin or 4 μM MAD1 alone and in combination. Data represent volume in arbitrary units (a.u.) and median.
Anti Acrolein, supplied by StressMarq, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pmc08529717-74-30-31?v=StressMarq
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti acrolein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd goat antirabbit secondary antibody
Chemotherapeutic synergy. (a) Isobolograms of MAD1 and Doxorubicin (Dox), <t>Paclitaxel</t> (Ptx) or Cisplatin (Cis) combinatorial synergy in OVCAR-3 (left) and NCI/ADR-RES (right) cells. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) < 1 and < 0.5 represent additive and synergistic effects, respectively. (b) Comparison of Dox and Cis IC50 towards NCI/ADR-RES as either a monotherapy (ADR-RES, black) or in combination with 20 μM MAD1 (ADR-RES + MAD1, grey). Activity of each drug as a monotherapy in pre-resistant OVCAR-3 (OVCAR-3, white) cells shown for comparison. (c–f) Indicated ovarian cancer cell line or patient-derived ovarian carcinoma cells were cultured in ultra-low attachment conditions and treated for 48 h with 2 μM cisplatin or 4 μM MAD1 alone and in combination. Data represent volume in arbitrary units (a.u.) and median.
Goat Antirabbit Secondary Antibody, supplied by Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pmc10760541-73-11-18?v=Shanghai+Korain+Biotech+Co+Ltd
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat antirabbit secondary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boster Bio polyclonal anti pi3k
Chemotherapeutic synergy. (a) Isobolograms of MAD1 and Doxorubicin (Dox), <t>Paclitaxel</t> (Ptx) or Cisplatin (Cis) combinatorial synergy in OVCAR-3 (left) and NCI/ADR-RES (right) cells. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) < 1 and < 0.5 represent additive and synergistic effects, respectively. (b) Comparison of Dox and Cis IC50 towards NCI/ADR-RES as either a monotherapy (ADR-RES, black) or in combination with 20 μM MAD1 (ADR-RES + MAD1, grey). Activity of each drug as a monotherapy in pre-resistant OVCAR-3 (OVCAR-3, white) cells shown for comparison. (c–f) Indicated ovarian cancer cell line or patient-derived ovarian carcinoma cells were cultured in ultra-low attachment conditions and treated for 48 h with 2 μM cisplatin or 4 μM MAD1 alone and in combination. Data represent volume in arbitrary units (a.u.) and median.
Polyclonal Anti Pi3k, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pmc06851401-278-41-45?v=Boster+Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyclonal anti pi3k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Boster Bio pbs txnip
Figure 2: Effects of systemic hypoxia stimulation on the expression of <t>TXNIP/NLRP3</t> signaling pathway-related factors in periodontal tissues of rats: (a) immunofluorescence staining (IF) showed that TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1 in periodontal tissues. Ab: alveolar; PL: periodontal ligament; R: root. Scale bars = 25 μm. (b) RT-PCR analysis of TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β in periodontal tissues (n = 5). (c) Western blotting analysis of TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β in periodontal tissues (n = 5 for each group). The above data are presented as the mean ± SEM, ∗p < 0:05.
Pbs Txnip, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+bounds/pm35083332-130-16-20?v=Boster+Bio
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pbs txnip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FAPα + Macrophages Are Enriched in the Myeloma Microenvironment and Correlate with Disease Progression. (A) Heatmap of gene expression in macrophages from patients with MM (n = 3) or healthy donors (HDs, n = 3). (B,C) Cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages (CD11b + CD14 + ) and FAPα + BMSC (CD45 − CD38 − CD29 + ) in PBMCs or BMMCs from patients with MM (n = 9). (D) Reprehensive immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in the BM of a NDMM patient (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (E–G) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages and FAPα + BMSCs in BMMCs from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 27) or HDs (n = 4). (H) Correlation analysis of the cell percentages between CD138 + MM cells and FAPα + macrophages or FAPα + BMSCs in patients with NDMM (n = 15). (I) Reprehensive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) images of CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM or MM‐CR (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (J,K) Western blot (J) and flow cytometry (K) analysis of FAPα expression in macrophages co‐cultured with MM cells (n = 3). (L) TGFβ1 expression in different MM cell lines. (M‐N) TGFβ1‐induced FAPα protein expression in macrophages (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (O) M‐CSF, TGFβ1, and FAPα levels in BM supernatants from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 37) using ELISA assay. (P) Correlation analysis of FAPα and TGFβ1 or M‐CSF in BM supernatant from patients with NDMM (n = 17). (Q) Reprehensive IHC images of bone marrow samples from patients with MM (n = 18) (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (R) IOD values of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in patients with NDMM or RRMM (n = 18). (S) Correlation analysis between CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM. (T) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and overall OS in the set of patients with NDMM based on FAP protein expression level detected in tumor tissues. The median value of FAP RNA expression in the was 88.26 (IOD). The expression value of the FAP high group (n = 9) was >88.26(IOD) and the FAP low group (n = 9) was <88.26(IOD). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot means independent samples. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2‐tailed Student's t ‐test in C, E, F, G, K, O, and R, a Pearson correlation in H, P, and S, a log‐rank test in T. MM, multiple myeloma; HD, healthy donors; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BMMCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BM, bone marrow; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; RRMM, relapsed or refractory MM; CR, complete response; TGFβ1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; M‐CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IOD, Integrated Optical Density; RRMM, Relapsed/Refractory MM; PFS, Progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: FAPα + Macrophages Orchestrate Immune Evasion in Multiple Myeloma by Dual Regulation of PD‐L1 and T Cell Senescence

doi: 10.1002/advs.202506239

Figure Lengend Snippet: FAPα + Macrophages Are Enriched in the Myeloma Microenvironment and Correlate with Disease Progression. (A) Heatmap of gene expression in macrophages from patients with MM (n = 3) or healthy donors (HDs, n = 3). (B,C) Cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages (CD11b + CD14 + ) and FAPα + BMSC (CD45 − CD38 − CD29 + ) in PBMCs or BMMCs from patients with MM (n = 9). (D) Reprehensive immunofluorescence staining (IF) images of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in the BM of a NDMM patient (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (E–G) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell percentages of FAPα + macrophages and FAPα + BMSCs in BMMCs from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 27) or HDs (n = 4). (H) Correlation analysis of the cell percentages between CD138 + MM cells and FAPα + macrophages or FAPα + BMSCs in patients with NDMM (n = 15). (I) Reprehensive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) images of CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM or MM‐CR (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (J,K) Western blot (J) and flow cytometry (K) analysis of FAPα expression in macrophages co‐cultured with MM cells (n = 3). (L) TGFβ1 expression in different MM cell lines. (M‐N) TGFβ1‐induced FAPα protein expression in macrophages (Magnification ×400. Scale bar, 50 µm). (O) M‐CSF, TGFβ1, and FAPα levels in BM supernatants from patients with MM at different disease stages (n = 37) using ELISA assay. (P) Correlation analysis of FAPα and TGFβ1 or M‐CSF in BM supernatant from patients with NDMM (n = 17). (Q) Reprehensive IHC images of bone marrow samples from patients with MM (n = 18) (Magnification ×200. Scale bar, 50 µm). (R) IOD values of CD138, CD68, and FAPα in patients with NDMM or RRMM (n = 18). (S) Correlation analysis between CD138 and FAPα in patients with NDMM. (T) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and overall OS in the set of patients with NDMM based on FAP protein expression level detected in tumor tissues. The median value of FAP RNA expression in the was 88.26 (IOD). The expression value of the FAP high group (n = 9) was >88.26(IOD) and the FAP low group (n = 9) was <88.26(IOD). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot means independent samples. ns, no significant difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using a 2‐tailed Student's t ‐test in C, E, F, G, K, O, and R, a Pearson correlation in H, P, and S, a log‐rank test in T. MM, multiple myeloma; HD, healthy donors; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BMMCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BM, bone marrow; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; RRMM, relapsed or refractory MM; CR, complete response; TGFβ1, Transforming growth factor beta 1; M‐CSF, macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; IOD, Integrated Optical Density; RRMM, Relapsed/Refractory MM; PFS, Progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.

Article Snippet: The bone marrow supernatants of patients with different MM stages were collected, and different cytokines were detected as described by the respective manufacturers: Human M‐CSF AccuSignal ELISA Kit (Cat #KOA0253, Rockland, USA), Human Seprase/FAP AccuSignal ELISA Kit (Cat #KOA0627, Rockland, USA), Human TGFβ1 ELISA Kit (Cat #1117102) (All from Dakewe Bioengineering Co., Ltd, China).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Gene Expression, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Immunohistochemical staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Cell Culture, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, RNA Expression, Immunohistochemistry

Chemotherapeutic synergy. (a) Isobolograms of MAD1 and Doxorubicin (Dox), Paclitaxel (Ptx) or Cisplatin (Cis) combinatorial synergy in OVCAR-3 (left) and NCI/ADR-RES (right) cells. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) < 1 and < 0.5 represent additive and synergistic effects, respectively. (b) Comparison of Dox and Cis IC50 towards NCI/ADR-RES as either a monotherapy (ADR-RES, black) or in combination with 20 μM MAD1 (ADR-RES + MAD1, grey). Activity of each drug as a monotherapy in pre-resistant OVCAR-3 (OVCAR-3, white) cells shown for comparison. (c–f) Indicated ovarian cancer cell line or patient-derived ovarian carcinoma cells were cultured in ultra-low attachment conditions and treated for 48 h with 2 μM cisplatin or 4 μM MAD1 alone and in combination. Data represent volume in arbitrary units (a.u.) and median.

Journal: Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering

Article Title: Re-engineering Antimicrobial Peptides into Oncolytics Targeting Drug-Resistant Ovarian Cancers

doi: 10.1007/s12195-020-00626-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: Chemotherapeutic synergy. (a) Isobolograms of MAD1 and Doxorubicin (Dox), Paclitaxel (Ptx) or Cisplatin (Cis) combinatorial synergy in OVCAR-3 (left) and NCI/ADR-RES (right) cells. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) < 1 and < 0.5 represent additive and synergistic effects, respectively. (b) Comparison of Dox and Cis IC50 towards NCI/ADR-RES as either a monotherapy (ADR-RES, black) or in combination with 20 μM MAD1 (ADR-RES + MAD1, grey). Activity of each drug as a monotherapy in pre-resistant OVCAR-3 (OVCAR-3, white) cells shown for comparison. (c–f) Indicated ovarian cancer cell line or patient-derived ovarian carcinoma cells were cultured in ultra-low attachment conditions and treated for 48 h with 2 μM cisplatin or 4 μM MAD1 alone and in combination. Data represent volume in arbitrary units (a.u.) and median.

Article Snippet: 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), Fmoc-protected amino acids, N,N 0 -diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC), O-(7-Azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU), N,N -dimethylformamide (DMF), and Paclitaxel were purchased from Chem-Impex International, Inc. RPMI-1640, M199, trypsin and EDTA solution, Antibiotic-Antimycotic Solution, ultra-low attachment (ULA) plates, and 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Corning.

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Comparison, Activity Assay, Derivative Assay, Cell Culture

Figure 2: Effects of systemic hypoxia stimulation on the expression of TXNIP/NLRP3 signaling pathway-related factors in periodontal tissues of rats: (a) immunofluorescence staining (IF) showed that TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1 in periodontal tissues. Ab: alveolar; PL: periodontal ligament; R: root. Scale bars = 25 μm. (b) RT-PCR analysis of TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β in periodontal tissues (n = 5). (c) Western blotting analysis of TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β in periodontal tissues (n = 5 for each group). The above data are presented as the mean ± SEM, ∗p < 0:05.

Journal: BioMed research international

Article Title: Effects of Hypoxic Environment on Periodontal Tissue through the ROS/TXNIP/NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathway.

doi: 10.1155/2022/7690960

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2: Effects of systemic hypoxia stimulation on the expression of TXNIP/NLRP3 signaling pathway-related factors in periodontal tissues of rats: (a) immunofluorescence staining (IF) showed that TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1 in periodontal tissues. Ab: alveolar; PL: periodontal ligament; R: root. Scale bars = 25 μm. (b) RT-PCR analysis of TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β in periodontal tissues (n = 5). (c) Western blotting analysis of TXNIP, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β in periodontal tissues (n = 5 for each group). The above data are presented as the mean ± SEM, ∗p < 0:05.

Article Snippet: For IF, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°Cwith primary antibodies (1 : 250) diluted in PBS: TXNIP (Rabbit IgG, Boster, China), NLRP3 (Rabbit IgG, Boster, China), ASC (Rabbit IgG, Immunoway, USA), and caspase-1 (Rabbit IgG, Immunoway, China) and then incubated with Alexa Fluor-488 and Alexa Fluor-555 conjugate secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1h.

Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot